John Durham Documented the Biggest Illegal Dirty Trick in U.S. History

Watergate was a minnow compared to the Russian collusion hoax manufactured by Hillary Clinton and utilized by the corrupt FBI, which would be a whale in comparison.

The FBI knew it was fake in August of 2016, but they disregarded that fact in what can only be described as treason.

But, you and I know that no one will suffer consequences for their acts like the people involved in the Watergate break-in, That’s because they were Republicans. No Democratic privilege for them.

Special Counsel John Durham exposed the largest political hoax in the history of this country. Compare that to the J6 political prisoners, some of whom rotted in prison for two years for misdemeanors.

Between the FBI and Robert Mueller, they spent in excess of $50 million taxpayer dollars for purely political reasons.

Durham laid out the entire mess and he named names, but the lamestream media has called a lid on the story. They won’t report it for love or money.

Durham stated in his report that neither the FBI nor the CIA had even a small amount of proof of collusion. But, remember, they knew that from the start.

But, more importantly, Durham discovered a meeting in the White House with President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, CIA Director John Brennan, FBI Director James Comey, and Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

In that meeting, Brennan laid out Hillary’s strategy, but they kept that to themselves because they were scared of Trump winning the White House and showing what a true conservative could do. Then Biden took over and demonstrated what a liberal can’t do.

Specifically, Durham’s report says:

“What the FBI knew from its intelligence collections as of early 2017. As the record reflects, as of early 2017, the FBI still did not possess any intelligence showing that anyone associated with the Trump campaign was in contact with Russian intelligence officers during the campaign.”

From The Gateway Pundit

These unidentified sources reportedly stated that (i) U.S. law enforcement and intelligence agencies intercepted communications of members of Trump’s campaign and other Trump associates that showed repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence officials in the year before the election; (ii) former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort had been one of the individuals picked up on the intercepted “calls;” and (iii) the intercepted communications between Trump associates and Russians had been initially captured by the NSA.

However, official FBI documentation reflects that all three of these highly concerning claims of Trump-related contacts with Russian intelligence were untrue. Indeed, in a contemporaneous critique of the Times article prepared by Peter Strzok, who was steeped in the details of Crossfire Hurricane, all three of the above-referenced allegations were explicitly refuted. Strzok’s evaluation of the allegations included the following:

• The FBI had not seen any evidence of any individuals affiliated with the Trump team in contact with Russian intelligence officers. He characterized this allegation as misleading and inaccurate as written. He noted that there had been some individuals in contact with Russians, both governmental and non-governmental, but none of these individuals had an affiliation with Russian intelligence. He also noted previous contact between Carter Page and a Russian intelligence officer, but this contact did not occur during Page’s association with the Trump campaign.
• The FBI had no information in its holdings, nor had it received any such information from other members of the Intelligence Community, that Paul Manafort had been a party to a call with any Russian government official. Strzok noted that the Intelligence Community had not provided the FBI with any such information even though the FBI had advised certain agencies of its interest in anything they might hold or collect regarding Manafort.
• Regarding the allegation that the NSA initially captured these communications between Trump campaign officials and Trump associates and the Russians, Strzok repeated that if such communications had been collected by the NSA, the FBI was not aware of that fact.”