IRS Whistleblower Confirms: AG Merrick Garland Lied Under Oath, Committed Perjury, Has Obstructed Prosecution of Hunter Biden

Can you believe that this corrupt AG Merrick Garland almost made it to the Supreme Court? That is one of the very few things Mitch McConnell got right. He refused to allow a vote on Garland and once Trump took office, Garland’s nomination was dead. Now, as the Attorney General for Joe Biden, we get to see that we dodged a bullet when he was denied the appointment. He has proven that he is a liar and he is corrupt to the core.

The IRS whistleblower can prove that Garlqand committed perjury when he was questioned by members of Congress. He claims that Joe Biden has interfered in the investigation into his son and that he was aided by Merrick Garland. If this is true, the Republicans should hoard all the evidence they can about both Joe and Hunter Biden as well as the actions of Merrick Garland until next year after Biden wins the Democratic nomination for president. By that time it will be too late to find a strong replacement.

The New York Post reported on Thursday night the Attorney General Merrick Garland IS the “senior” Biden official mentioned by the whistleblower who is preventing Hunter Biden from being criminally charged.

The New York Post reported:

Attorney General Merrick Garland is the unnamed official whose sworn testimony before Congress is being challenged in a bombshell letter from an IRS whistleblower’s attorney that also alleges a coverup in the Hunter Biden criminal investigation, The Post has learned.

Attorney Mark Lytle wrote Wednesday that the longtime IRS employee wants to provide information to congressional leaders to “contradict sworn testimony to Congress by a senior political appointee” — Garland —and also to detail “preferential treatment” in the criminal probe of the first son.

The whistleblower already made disclosures to the inspectors general of the Treasury and Justice departments.

However, due to a quirk of federal law, he needs congressional approval to more fully describe his allegations to his own lawyers, which he wants to do before testifying to lawmakers.

Garland has repeatedly claimed under oath that Delaware US Attorney David Weiss, a Trump administration holdover recommended in 2017 by the state’s Democratic senators, is able to criminally charge Hunter Biden without the permission of other Justice Department leaders, despite Republicans challenging the factual accuracy of that claim.

This is not the first time Garland has lied under oath. He lied about the protesters at the homes of Supreme Court justices’ homes.

From The Gateway Pundit

Senator Britt: You said, quote, “The marshals have been advised, and they know and the marshals on the ground, they have full authority to arrest people under any federal statute, including that federal statute,” end quote. That was in direct reference to Section 1507. You went on to say, the Attorney General does not decide whether to arrest. The Marshals on the scene they do make the decision of whether to arrest.”

The freshman senator continued:

Senator Britt: “After your appearance before the Judiciary Committee, we obtained copies of the slide deck that were used to train and prepare the Marshals for their protective detail at the homes of the Justices. Those training materials show that the marshals likely didn’t make any arrests under Section 1507 for a pretty simple reason they were actively discouraged from doing so. As you can see on the slide behind me, the marshals were explicitly told to avoid, unless absolutely necessary, any criminal enforcement action involving the protester.

It gets worse. The DOJ told the Marshals NOT TO ENGAGE in “protest-related enforcement.”

Senator Britt: The next slide directs the Marshals not to engage in protest-related enforcement actions beyond those that were strictly and immediately necessary and tailored to ensure the physical security of the justices. If you’ll see in the next slide here, it discourages the Marshals from making arrests under any section 1507 by asserting that “there may be a First Amendment right to harass the families of the judges.”

When will he be charged with perjury and has his rear end tossed into a cell?