News From The Right Side

Close this search box.
NYT, ABC, CBS, & Rolling Stone All Fail to Get Their  Sandmann’s Libel Suits Dismissed: Face Hundreds of Millions in Damages

NYT, ABC, CBS, & Rolling Stone All Fail to Get Their Sandmann’s Libel Suits Dismissed: Face Hundreds of Millions in Damages

All remaining libel suits brought by Nick Sandmann to go to trial.
Follow America's fastest-growing news aggregator, Spreely News, and stay informed. You can find all of our articles plus information from your favorite Conservative voices. 

CNN and The Washington Post look like geniuses after having settled their libel suits by Nicholas Sandmann out of the way for as little as possible.

The NYT, ABC, CBS, and Rolling Stone rolled the dice and tried to get their cases dismissed. That will likely cost them dearly as Sandmann does not need to be rushed into settling with them thanks to the huge settlements with CNN and the Washington Post. He can afford to hold out for the maximum payment.

By holding out the four outlets have killed almost any chance they had at a settlement with Sandmann and they now have to take their chances with the juries.

And juries love awarding huge settlements. This is especially true since the chances of them being found not guilty of libel is miniscule at best. All four will have separate trials and those trials should be scheduled very soon.

Our friend William Jacobson has the links to the four court orders denying the motions to dismiss, all separately for each respondent. William excerpts the explanation denying the motion from the New York Times as fairly representative of the response to all four:

Greatly summarized, the Complaint alleges that Sandmann was libeled by the defendant when it published a news article stating that Sandmann, while at the Lincoln Memorial, “blocked” NativeAmerican activist Nathan Phillips and “prevented Phillips’ retreat while Nicholas and a mass of other young white boys surrounded, taunted, jeered and physically intimidated Phillips.” (Compl. ¶ 3).

This news story is alleged to be false and defamatory. (Id.). Sandmann further alleges that this publication by defendant and similar stories by other news media caused him to be harassed by the public, causing him great emotional distress. (Compl. ¶¶ 25, 162-164, 251-257). Sandmann also alleges that defendant’s article “is now forever a part of the historical Internet record and will haunt and taint Nicholas for the remainder of his natural life and impugn his reputation for generations to come.” (Compl. ¶ 254).

The motion to dismiss argues that this publication is not libelous, but the Court has ruled in companion cases that it is libelous. The Court continues to hold that opinion for the reason stated in such preceding cases. See Sandmann v. The Washington Post, Cov. Case No. 19cv19 (Docs. 47, 64); Sandmann v. Cable News Network, Cov. Case No. 19cv31 (Docs. 43, 44); Sandmann v. NBCUniversal Media, LLC, Cov. Case No. 19cv56 (Doc. 43).

From Hot Air

However, this excerpt from the court’s response to Rolling Stone seems even more germane. The magazine’s attorneys attempted to use Croce v NY Times to argue that all their client did was provide an account of the facts at hand. The court noted that this precedent technically doesn’t apply since all parties agreed to be bound by Kentucky rather than Ohio law, but it won’t hold up in the particulars of Sandmann’s complaint anyway:

In Croce, a newspaper published an article that included unflattering allegations against the plaintiff, a university professor and cancer researcher. The Court held that, in “full context,” a “reasonable reader would interpret the article as a standard piece of investigative journalism” which simply reported “newsworthy allegations with appropriate qualifying language.” Id. at 794-95.

That holding is inapplicable under the allegations of the Complaint here. Sandmann alleges that defendants published a factual, defamatory statement by Phillips, period. No amount of context removes that meaning. Sandmann further alleges that defendants failed to exercise reasonable journalistic care in determining whether Phillips’ statements should have been published at all. Therefore, the Court holds that the Complaint states a claim for relief.

Note especially the reference to discovery, the process by which attorneys for each side can demand documentation and depositions. 

That’s what these media outlets want to avoid most. For one thing, that battle is absurdly asymmetrical.

How much discovery can these media outlets get from a teenager? On the other hand, Wood can use that process to depose everyone up the managerial chain, right up to the top of the outlets, and use the depositions to wage public war on them.

Share the Post:

Comments 15

  1. Excellent work, Mike. I greatly commend your effort because I currently generate more than $38,000 each month from just one simple web business! Even with just $29,000, you may start developing a reliable online income and these are just the most basic internet operations occupations.
    Switch the connection————————————>>> W­w­w.B­i­z­W­o­r­k­1.C­o­m

  2. Sharon says:

    I hope it all goes to jury trial and I know the jury will award him HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of Dollars! — because if I were on this jury, I would!! All those stations and Rolling stones, ALL went on the news to LIE about what REALLY happened — they think they know it all without getting the real facts! These Hundreds of Millions of dollars with make the owners of the media stations and newspapers/mags require their broadcasters/editors to get the TRUE FACTS before they blab/write their news stories!!

    • David says:

      YES! And the truth is coming out about George Floyd, Derick Chauvin should also be getting hundreds of millions of dollars for being wrongfully accused of murder.

      • GaryGary says:

        We all hope so to compensate him for all the suffering he has gone thru because they didn’t want to project they were racist but not listing the true cause of death of a drug addict.
        Well the Floyd family came out well, hope there spending wisely, now it’s Dericks turn to make some cash for his family and retire some where he can fade away from the harassment he has put up with..

      • Louise Barnes says:

        Chauvin was stabbed in prison a few days ago! His mom found out about it from the news media- the prison did not notify her!

  3. Ronny Cawthon says:

    Drain every penny from these communist assholes.

  4. Don says:

    Bankrupt them all as the liars they are.

    • bob says:


      • I make over thirty k a month working part-time. I kept hearing from other people telling me how much money they could make online, so I decided to find out. Well, it was all true and it completely changed my life.

        This Is Where I Started………. W­w­w.M­o­n­e­y­P­a­y­1.c­o­m

  5. Don Arnold says:

    Besides financial penalties the liars should serve jail time. The job of the news media is to only report the real news without their leftist slant on everything that distorts the truth and misleads the public..

  6. Good for Nick Sandman. What they said about you when all of that happened was terrible. My husband even called someone that had been talking about what had happened to you to file a law suit against the paper

  7. hey there and thank you for your info – I’ve definitely picked up anything new
    from right here. I did however expertise several technical points using this site, as I experienced to reload the site a lot of times previous
    to I could get it to load properly. I had been wondering if your web host is OK?
    Not that I’m complaining, but sluggish loading instances times will very frequently affect
    your placement in google and could damage your high quality score if advertising
    and marketing with Adwords. Anyway I’m adding this RSS to my email and can look out for a
    lot more of your respective intriguing content. Make sure you update this again soon.

  8. Hi there to every , because I am genuinely keen of reading this weblog’s post to be
    updated daily. It includes fastidious stuff.

  9. Thaer says:

    Highly descriptive post, I loved that bit.
    Will there be a part 2?

  10. dobry sklep says:

    Just wish to say your article is as surprising. The clearness
    in your post is just great and i could assume you are an expert on this subject.
    Fine with your permission let me to grab your RSS feed
    to keep updated with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please
    carry on the enjoyable work.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *