Former US Attorney Says Biden Ukraine Bribery Allegation Credible Enough to Merit Further Investigation, But FBI Stonewalled His Probe

A former US Attorney told the House Judiciary Committee that the Biden Ukraine bribery allegations were credible. Credible enough in fact to warrant further investigation, but he was stonewalled by the FBI, the worst law enforcement agency ever in any country in the world and one that must be done away with.

Of course a new agency must be formed, but one that would not allow any current employee to even apply, let alone be hired.

Former prosecutor Scott Brady, a Trump-appointed US Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania, also said that the FBI refused to allow him access to Hunter Biden’s laptop to protect the Democratic Party. The FBI had that laptop since 2019 and did their best to hide that fact from the American voters.

They refused to give bBrady access to the laptop in 2020. The FBI was in possession of Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop in 2019 before the Democrats impeached Trump over his phone call to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

Brady testified before the House Judiciary Committee that his office found very credible evidence during the early stages oh his investigation into the Biden bribery scandal.

This was during the probe into Hunter Biden and his work for Burisma and Ukrainian oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky. Brady made criminal referrals in Brooklyn, Manhattan, and Delaware, but to no avail.

Scott Brady said of the FBI in his testimony to the House Judiciary:

“It was a challenging working relationship. I think there was reluctance on the part of the FBI to really do any tasking related to our assignment from DAG Rosen and looking into allegations of Ukrainian corruption broadly and then specifically anything that intersected with Hunter Biden and his role in Burisma. It was very challenging.”

From The Gateway Pundit

The FBI also hid the fact that they were even aware of Hunter Biden’s laptop.

Excerpt from Just the News:

In bombshell testimony, the federal prosecutor who initially probed the Biden family’s dealings in Ukraine told Congress his team had corroborated enough of an FBI informant’s claim of an alleged bribery scheme involving Joe Biden to merit further investigation but he encountered unprecedented foot-dragging and “reluctance” inside both the FBI and the Delaware U.S. Attorney’s office that took over the case, Just the News has learned.

Former Pittsburgh U.S. Attorney Scott Brady revealed to the House Judiciary Committee that his team found enough credible evidence in its initial review of Hunter Biden’s dealings with the Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings and possible corruption by Joe Biden to refer criminal matters to three separate U.S. Attorney’s offices in Brooklyn, Manhattan and Delaware for further investigation.

Brady was critical of the FBI, noting the bureau never told his office it had Hunter Biden’s laptop and had corroborated its contents even as DOJ prosecutors investigated the Ukraine allegations.

“I would have thought that would be something, especially as has been publicly reported, there’s information relating to Hunter Biden’s activities on the board of Burisma in Ukraine, that might have been helpful in our assessment of the information that we were receiving about him. I would have expected that be shared,” he said.

“Based on the information provided to my office over a period of years by multiple credible whistleblowers, there appears to be an effort within the Justice Department and FBI to shut down investigative activity relating to the Biden family,” Grassley wrote in a letter to US Attorney General Merrick Garland and FBI Director Christopher Wray. “Such decisions point to significant political bias infecting the decision-making of not only the Attorney General and FBI Director, but also line agents and prosecutors.”

Grassley wrote: “Our Republic cannot survive such a political infection and you have an obligation to this country to clear the air.”