The Democrats no longer hide the disdain they feel for judges who rule against them, they just refuse to accept their judgment and do whatever pleases them.
The FBI is a prime example. They have been ordered to turn over the material they have on Seth Rich but not until the case is so old no one cares anymore. Seth Rich was a Bernie Sanders supporter who worked for the DNC.
Rich was out one night in Washington, D.C., when he was shot twice in the back and left for dead. The FBI and police claim it was a robbery gone bad and that the thieves ran away without taking anything from Rich because they were frightened that someone heard the shots.
That makes no sense to me. They had guns and they could have robbed him first if they were afraid the noise of the shots would draw the police.
I’m not concluding or excluding any possibility, but I do like it when things make sense and this doesn’t. He was shot in the back, meaning that the two alleged thieves never even tried to confront him. Then they left without his watch and his wallet, which would have taken mere seconds to lift.
When the original request went out, the FBI claimed they had nothing in the Seth Rich case. Now, they claim they have 400,000 pages. What are they hiding?
It has been speculated that Rich was angered by the fact that the DNC conspired against Bernie Sanders and for Hillary Clinton, stole the DNC emails and gave them to WikiLeaks. Julian Assange even offered a $20,000 reward for information leading to an arrest and conviction of the murderer or murderers. None of that is conclusive, but there are questions.
The FBI claimed that the emails were stolen by the Chinese even though they never got to examine the DNC servers. Meanwhile, CrowdStrike, the company that did examine the servers not only said they could not confirm that Russians hacked the servers, but they also could not even confirm that the servers were hacked.
And to top it off, guess who was appointed as Special Counsel on the Seth Rich case? Robert Mueller. If anything raises suspicion on the Seth Rich case, that would be number one on my list.
If there is nothing there, why not release the documents? This is a pattern with the Democrats. They want 66 years to release this information and they want 75 years to release information on the experimental vaccines. Never put off today what you can forget about completely.
One claim, denounced by Vox as an “intense right-wing conspiracy theor[y],” suggested that Rich had something to do with the internal DNC email leaks published by WikiLeaks, which appeared to reveal that the committee had conspired with the Clinton campaign to work against Sen. Bernie Sanders (D-Vt.).
Proponents of this theory were denounced by Rich’s family in a number of instances sued.
NPR reported that, according to this narrative, Rich was a disgruntled Sanders supporter who had “secretly stolen thousands of emails and given them to Wikileaks to try to stop Hillary Clinton from winning the the presidency” and that “Clinton and the Democrats had arranged his killing.”
Julian Assange appeared to advance this theory when he referenced Rich’s murder in conversation with the Dutch current affairs program “Nieuwsuur.”
“Whistleblowers go to significant efforts to get [Wikileaks] material and often very significant risks. As a 27-year-old that works for the DNC who was shot in the back, murdered, just a few weeks ago for unknown reasons as he was walking down the street in Washington … our sources take risks and they become concerned to see things occurring like that.”